
In some rural areas of South Africa, there are only three doctors for every 100,000 people.
How can we tell the UK not to recruit our doctors if we do the same. Thami Mseleku
|
With more South African doctors now working abroad than in the country's ailing public health sector, the government needs to start aggressively recruiting health workers from other countries, according to a non-profit recruitment organisation.
Dr Clarence Mini, of Africa Health Placements, which specialises in placing public-health professionals, told a national tuberculosis conference in the port city of Durban earlier this month that more than 4,000 doctor's posts were currently unfilled in South Africa's state hospitals, while 3,000 South African-qualified doctors are working in the United Kingdom and 2,000 in the United States.
Health workers have become a highly mobile resource that countries have to compete for, Mini told delegates. First-world countries that offered better salaries and working conditions have managed to attract the lion's share of those resources: the United States now has about 550 doctors per 100,000 citizens, compared to South Africa's 65.
To make matters worse, 75 percent of South Africa's doctors work in the private sector, and most of those remaining in the public sector work in urban areas, while in rural areas the doctor-to-patient ratio can be as low as three doctors to 100,000 people. In the context of South Africa's HIV/AIDS burden, this amounts to a crisis.
One of the quickest and cheapest solutions to the problem, argued Mini, was to recruit foreign doctors and nurses: it cost about R2 million (US$263,000) to train a doctor, compared to about R100,000 (US$13,000) to recruit one from overseas.
The South African government has taken the stance that recruiting health workers from other African countries with similarly or even more poorly staffed pubic health sectors is not the answer.
|